for the Week Ending February 12, 2012

Questions and Answers on
Notices to Terminate Tenancies (2)

Get FREE Property Management
Information by Email

Do you have a tip or idea you would like to share with other landlords? We are looking for techniques and tricks that work for you and might work for others.

Please include your name. We will print only your first name and last initial, unless you tell us it's okay to use your entire name.

Email your tip


All material on this website is protected by the copyright laws of the United States and may be reprinted
only
under specific circumstances.

How to Get Reprint Rights

This week's featured
landlord success tool:

Proud member of the 
Read the Bills Act Coalition

Last week's tip, in case you missed it.

We received the following valuable tip from Joan Falknor:

My best "insurance" policy is to have pest control every month.  We not only have a bug free apartment building, but I get a chance to get in and check out every apartment every month because the pest control guy won't enter the apartment without me. The tenants brag to other people that they never have to worry about bugs. Total cost is $42 for 14 units each month. 

We got some great ideas about how to ensure a tenant moves out when he or she promises from two landlords. Both are great ideas we can use right away.

I was reading your tip and I had a tenant do this to me, not pay rent for the month and then move out in the middle of the night.  I have since changed my lease to include a "Hold-over Tenant Clause" that states if the tenants give a 30 day notice and then does not move, their rent becomes 120%. (Regular rent $1,000/month, new rent $1,200/month). I have not had a tenant do this again!!  Also when the tenant sends the 30 day notice, I send an acknowledgement (certified return receipt) acknowledging the move, the security deposit agreement and the hold-over tenant clause.  This explicitly makes it clear that the tenant cannot stay without paying.

Jennifer R.
Momoni & Associates LLC
New Jersey

____________________________________
Regarding the comments about end-of-lease marketing:

I start 60 days out with a letter requesting a reply as to whether or not the tenant will be renewing their lease.  I offer incentives anywhere from a reduced increase to no increase in the rent.  I typically will hold back on a rent increase for Year 2 if the tenant has paid on time and maintained the property.  I also have built-in an extra amount in the initial rent to cover a 2nd  year increase.  So when lease renewal time comes around, the tenant is happy and I look like the good guy.  The lease does contain all the language for an increase due for the additional year but I use a “lease renewal addendum” to amend that section for the subsequent year.  In the 60 day letter, I specify that a reply in writing is due no later than 30 days prior to the lease expiration accepting the new terms.  All offers of rent increase adjustments are rescinded and the new monthly amount would increase to the maximum stated on the lease should the tenant reply within the 0 – 30 day period.  This way all paperwork is signed and finished at least 15 – 20 day prior to the lease expiration.

Some additional comments about going month-to-month at the end of the a lease: 

I have tenants who just decided to go that route after their first year with us.  They’re a young couple and want see about purchasing a home.  First, the M2M [month-to-month] rent increased to the full amount, as stated on the lease.  Second, I gave them a couple of options, a choice of renewing the lease after 3 months of M2M and after 6 months of M2M.  Both contained reductions from what they were paying M2M.  So if they find that the market is still a bit tight for their budget, they can drop me a line and get back on board with a lease.

All said, I like keeping my tenants.  I do a lot of due diligence to make sure that the right ones get in.  So far, so good.

John Gerlich

HL Ranch Properties

Landlord Question

Can an apartment building owner may legally reject an applicant with a history of mental illness, though he/she is not a danger to others.

No. Rejecting an applicant on that basis is a violation of the Fair Housing Act. However, if his or her landlord references indicate that that person has had complaints or has had to be threatened with eviction because of aberrant behavior, that is grounds for rejection.